Copyright © 2008 Corrupt Australia
hink of it all - of the life that is! Study your friends and foes! Study the past! And answer this: "Are these times better than those?" The life-long quarrel, the paltry spite, the sting of your poisoned pride! No matter who fell it were better to fight as they did when the world was wide.

Boast as you will of your mateship now - crippled and mean and sly - The lines of suspicion on friendship's brow were traced since the days gone by. There was room in the long, free lines of the van to fight for it side by side - There was beating-room for the heart of a man in the days when the world was wide.

With its dull, brown days of a-shilling-an-hour the dreary year drags round: Is this the result of Old England's power? - the bourne of the Outward Bound? Is this the sequel of Westward Ho! - of the days of Whate'er Betide? The heart of the rebel makes answer "No! We'll fight till the world grows wide!"

The world shall yet be a wider world - for the tokens are manifest; East and North shall the wrongs be hurled that followed us South and West. The march of Freedom is North by the Dawn! Follow, whate'er betide! Sons of the Exiles, march! March on! March till the world grows wide!

~ Henry Lawson

2008 - December
2008 - November
2008 - October
2008 - September
2008 - August
2008 - July
2008 - June
2008 - May
2008 - April
2008 - March
2008 - February
2008 - January
2007 - December
2007 - November
2007 - October
22 October 2008

« Australia: falling be… | Home | Corrupt AU - Site Mak… »

Tasmanian Premier vs Old-Growth Forests

"Mr Bartlett told The Australian that calls by the conservation movement to suspend old-growth logging, because of evidence they might be more valuable as carbon sinks, were nonsense.

"If you burn a tree, obviously the carbon is [released]. If you turn it into a coffee table, that carbon is sequestered for life or for a very bloody long time."

::View Article::

Sure, any carbon stored by a tree in its lifetime is not somehow automatically released into the atmosphere when it is simply cut from the ground. However when you cut down some of the oldest and tallest trees in the world, like the ones in Tasmania's old growth forests, you loose some big carbon sequesterers. Replacing them with new smaller and younger trees is obviously not going to be the same.

However not all environmental issues relate back to climate change. The validity of conservation of any sort, flora or fauna, should not simply rest on whether it helps the fight against climate change. Old growth forests in Tasmania represent a beautiful part of our national history and are areas of wilderness that, remarkably these days, still stand. Why not conserve them when so much of our floura has been removed? It's a question of balance. Here are some stats from the Australian Conservation Foundation that are relevant:


"Since European settlement half of Australia's forests and three quarters of its rainforests have been cleared and over 90% of old growth forests have been logged.

113 species of vertebrate forest animals found in forests are formally listed as threatened species on State or Commonwealth threatened species lists. This is over one twentieth of Australia's terrestrial animal species.

Every year the equivalent to 85% of the size of the Australian Capital Territory is logged in Australia's native forests. That's 200,000 hectares, or the equivalent of two million quarter acre suburban household blocks."

::View Article:: Used tags:
No comments


  
Emoticons / Textile

Comment moderation is enabled on this site. This means that your comment will not be visible on this site until it has been approved by an editor.

To prevent automated commentspam we require you to answer this silly question
 



Notify:
Hide email:

Small print: All html tags except <b> and <i> will be removed from your comment. You can make links by just typing the url or mail-address.