<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	
	<channel>
		<title>Corrupt Australia</title>
		<link>http://australia.corrupt.org/index.php</link>
		<description></description>
		<language>en</language>
		<managingEditor>dave_9311@hotmail.com</managingEditor>
                <copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
		<generator>Pivot Pivot - 1.40.6: 'Dreadwind'</generator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 22:52:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		
		
		
		
		<item>
			<title>Depression upswing in younger women</title>
			<link>http://australia.corrupt.org/entry/189/Depression_upswing_in_younger_</link>
			<comments>http://australia.corrupt.org/entry/189/Depression_upswing_in_younger_#comm</comments>
                        <description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><p>A new Women's Health Australia study suggests women aged 28 to 33 are in poorer mental health than their mothers or grandmothers, with almost one in five reporting a diagnosis of depression by a doctor, The Australian reports.<br />
<br />
They reported higher rates of depression (18 per cent) than women aged 53 to 58 (13 per cent) and those aged 79 to 84 (10 per cent). <br />
<br />
Study co-author Julie Byles from the University of Newcastle said the data understated the problem, given that 60 per cent of young women with depression were not on antidepressants. "It's only the tip of the iceberg," she said. </p></blockquote><br />
<br />
<a rel="nofollow external" href="http://www.news.com.au/story/0,27574,24812767-421,00.html" target="_blank">::View Article::</a><br />
<br />
<b>Why are younger women reporting higher rates of official depression diagnosis compared with older generations? Perhaps it has something to do with the fact that depression used to be a taboo topic in society, not something you were inclined to talk about with strangers leading to a situation in which older women do not report depression to their doctors or people conducting these sorts of studies.<br />
<br />
Perhaps, however, it has something to do with the contemporary Australian culture that has shaped the values and aspirations of women aged 28 to 33, in contrast to those epochs of Australian culture that women now aged 52 to 58 and also 79 to 84 formed their lives within when they were younger.<br />
<br />
This is not to put forth the nostalgic proposition that everything modern is evil and everything old was good, but rather that certain values and aspirations that have moved to the forefront of what our society promotes are often less than fulfilling: materialism and the associated empty cultivation of need that stems from always feeling like something is missing, individualism and the decline in the communitarian or collective aspects of daily life, and perhaps also the self-centred attitude towards relationships which portrays happiness coming from one night stands and casual sex.</b> ]]></description>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">189@http://australia.corrupt.org/pivot/</guid>
			<category>News</category>
			<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 15:21:00 -0800</pubDate>
		</item>
		
		
		
		<item>
			<title>Take it easy</title>
			<link>http://australia.corrupt.org/entry/188/Take_it_easy</link>
			<comments>http://australia.corrupt.org/entry/188/Take_it_easy#comm</comments>
                        <description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><p>A GAY activist from Sydney says his human rights have been violated by the human rights watchdog itself - because it refused to ban a "homophobic" Telstra ad about two men in a tent. <br />
<br />
In the ad, two men on a camping trip become suspicious when their two mates disappear into a tent. <br />
<br />
It later emerges they are simply watching cricket on the same mobile phone.</p></blockquote><br />
<br />
<a rel="nofollow external" href="http://www.news.com.au/story/0,27574,24806866-1242,00.html" target=_blank">::View Article::</a><br />
<br />
<b>Some activists need to lighten up. Australians embrace humour and a part of that humour seems to be to not take ourselves <i>too </i>seriously, whatever our lifestyles. <br />
<br />
This isn't to say poking fun at someone in a vicious manner is constructive, but rather that we can have a laugh at ourselves without it turning into a race to the court rooms. This is nice because it perhaps represents a lowering of the ego, or the collective understanding that all the different passions, desires and behaviours of human beings are pretty funny when considered from afar. <br />
<br />
Why does this activist want gay people to be treated 'unequally' in this respect?</b> ]]></description>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">188@http://australia.corrupt.org/pivot/</guid>
			<category>News</category>
			<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 09:19:00 -0800</pubDate>
		</item>
		
		
		
		<item>
			<title>Population growth</title>
			<link>http://australia.corrupt.org/entry/187/Population_growth</link>
			<comments>http://australia.corrupt.org/entry/187/Population_growth#comm</comments>
                        <description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><p>European Environment Commissioner Stavros Dimas yesterday joined the call for Australia to cut emissions by 25 to 40 per cent — the overall target range scientists say is necessary to avert dangerous climate change.<br />
<br />
In one of three speeches to the conference, Senator Wong warned it would be difficult for Australia to meet its long-term target of a 60 per cent cut by 2050 due to its growing population and energy-intensive economy, but said strong action would ultimately secure and create jobs.</p></blockquote><br />
<br />
<a rel="nofollow external" href="http://www.theage.com.au/national/put-plans-on-table-says-wong-20081212-6xl3.html" target="_blank">::View Article::</a><br />
<br />
<b>Population growth in Australia is taken as 'a given' by politicians and bureaucrats. Any policy measure, any forecasting about the future, any public debate simply accepts, in areas where population is relevant (i.e. the environment, town planning including suburban sprawl and housing, transport, infrastructure, water) that it will grow - significantly. <br />
<br />
But as the national population grew by as many as 336,800 new individuals in simply the one year to April 2008, the questions should be asked: Where has the idea of significant population growth been publically debated? Why is it never an election issue? Why is it an unspoken policy measure carried on by each succeeding government? <br />
<br />
<i>Carried on</i> by each succeeding government? Yes... <br />
<br />
See, 60 per cent of our national population growth comes from overseas migration, while only 40 per cent is due to 'natural increase' (domestic birth rates). So out of the near 337 thousand new Australians created in the year to April '08, either 'naturally' or via migration, roughly 202 thousand were migrants. Migration is a government initiative, a policy, even if largely unspoken. It is connected with the domestic religion of growth for the sake of growth.</b> ]]></description>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">187@http://australia.corrupt.org/pivot/</guid>
			<category>News</category>
			<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 11:16:00 -0800</pubDate>
		</item>
		
		
		
		<item>
			<title>'Sexualisation' continues</title>
			<link>http://australia.corrupt.org/entry/186/Sexualisation_continues</link>
			<comments>http://australia.corrupt.org/entry/186/Sexualisation_continues#comm</comments>
                        <description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><p>Despite mountains of evidence to the contrary, popular culture increasingly insists on pretending that women are always as hot for it as men are. <br />
<br />
A study by Girlguiding UK, released in June, showed that girls as young as 10 are anxious and stressed by the sexualising influence of popular culture. <br />
<br />
Walking past a lingerie shop in Carlton I spotted an advertisement that turned my stomach. <br />
<br />
"Hot Milk" targets pregnant women with the lie that its brand "celebrates the sensual, sexy woman inside the loving mother".</p></blockquote><br />
<br />
<a rel="nofollow external" href="http://www.news.com.au/story/0,27574,24783904-5007146,00.html" target="_blank">::View Article::</a><br />
<br />
<b>Our primarily commercial society operates via either creating or stimulating needs/desires that require (the purchase of) a certain product or service in order to be satisfied. <br />
<br />
Sex/beauty/attraction is one area of life in which this practice is really effective, and, increasingly, it's not being restricted simply to women. We're told, or it is 'suggested', in marketing slogans and campaigns, that we are not normal if we don't hot ourselves up in a certain way by wearing this or that, by applying this or that, or by looking like this or that hyper-sexualised (read: narcissistic) gender archetype.<br />
<br />
If people put too much stock in the commercial conception of ‘normal’ as narcissistic and hyper-sexual then this can be a breeding ground for insecurity, depression, and anxiety.</b> ]]></description>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">186@http://australia.corrupt.org/pivot/</guid>
			<category>News</category>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 09:07:00 -0800</pubDate>
		</item>
		
		
		
		<item>
			<title>Alcohol and violence a matter of values</title>
			<link>http://australia.corrupt.org/entry/185/Alcohol_and_violence_a_matter_</link>
			<comments>http://australia.corrupt.org/entry/185/Alcohol_and_violence_a_matter_#comm</comments>
                        <description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><p>The orthodox explanation for this alcohol-linked violence is that there is an underlying problem with Australia's drinking culture. In the face of liberal licensing conditions, we seem unable to control ourselves. In Finland, a country renowned for heavy drinking, a change in alcohol taxation in 2004 reduced prices and increased alcohol consumption. Evaluations found that the increase in consumption did not result in increased violence. In other cultures, it is not a fait accompli that more drinking results in increased violence.<br />
<br />
In Victoria, the main response to alcohol-related violence has been to restrict alcohol supply. Alone, this strategy will miss the point. Violence is a problem with Australian men and their relationship with alcohol. We can rewrite the unwritten rules for drunken comportment and a good place to start is with the figure of the larrikin.<br />
<br />
Changing some of these rules will be the most profound thing we can do to change the levels of alcohol-related violence in Victoria, perhaps far more profound than Hummers for the police or changing the closing hours of Melbourne bars and clubs.</p></blockquote><br />
<br />
<a rel="nofollow external" href="http://www.theage.com.au/opinion/booze-and-the-larrikin-an-ugly-mix-20081207-6t8a.html?page=-1" target="_blank">::View Article::</a><br />
<br />
<b>Australian's have enjoyed a drink since long before Ned Kelly donned a helmet and Burke and Wills led an expedition. Aggressive alcohol related violence is relatively high at the moment in places around the country, not because of access to drink. It's because of certain values which too many drinkers hold.<br />
<br />
The above article is good because it suggests that the violence becoming all-too characteristic of Melbourne's night life, for example, is caused by intangible 'things' like opinions and mental associations rather than the volume of alcohol being consumed or the degree of police presence on the streets. <br />
<br />
According to the article, alcohol companies are employing marketing campaigns whereby the brand names of popular drinks are directly associated with contemporary 'examples' of the Australian cultural archetype of the larrikin - people who do, or who are perceived as doing, what they want when they want. If we want to curb the violence then we have to address these values which operate on a societal/collective level.</b> ]]></description>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">185@http://australia.corrupt.org/pivot/</guid>
			<category>News</category>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 11:53:00 -0800</pubDate>
		</item>
		
		
		
		<item>
			<title>War on &quot;me&quot; generation</title>
			<link>http://australia.corrupt.org/entry/184/War_on_me_generation</link>
			<comments>http://australia.corrupt.org/entry/184/War_on_me_generation#comm</comments>
                        <description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><p>JOHN Brumby has declared war on the "me" generation of out-of-control young Victorians who lack respect and fuel crime.<br />
<br />
Mr Brumby's strategy will dominate the Government's social agenda next year. <br />
<br />
A round table of experts and parents will meet to carve out a way to teach the young right from wrong. <br />
<br />
Education ministers today are expected to declare a shared goal in Australia of better values among the young.</p></blockquote><br />
<br />
<a rel="nofollow external" href="http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,24752882-661,00.html" target="_blank">::View Article::</a><br />
<br />
<b>This will be interesting. <br />
<br />
Communities, or a group of people bound by some sort of consensus, definitely need to address the <i>content </i>of their values. Values are those intangible, though important, things which link a community together to varying degrees in that people share some goal(s). The individual, the collective, material wealth, some religion or another, sport, pleasure, work etc can all become things that are valued by a society/community. The individual can benefit from valuing the collective and the collective can benefit from value being placed on the individual - so it’s very dynamic and not so clear cut.<br />
<br />
It will be interesting to see whether Victorians and then Australians are able to reach a consensus on what values should be promoted to our youth. We live in a liberal, multicultural society: two social ideas which are not exactly allies to notions like 'shared goals' and 'common good' - unless what is shared and held in common is the promotion of different views on what is important in life and for society. Quite a confusing situation.<br />
<br />
Cases like this, i.e. youth violence/superfluous individualism, only begin to highlight the importance of consensus in a community. War torn regions like Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kosovo drive the point home. <br />
<br />
It's interesting to witness the paradoxes developing in large modern nations: how to maintain some low level consensus (order) in the face of ideologies like liberalism and multiculturalism which promote division.</b> ]]></description>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">184@http://australia.corrupt.org/pivot/</guid>
			<category>News</category>
			<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 12:12:00 -0800</pubDate>
		</item>
		
		
		
		<item>
			<title>New five year report is in: Victoria in population boom/ecological decline</title>
			<link>http://australia.corrupt.org/entry/183/New_five_year_report_is_in_Vic</link>
			<comments>http://australia.corrupt.org/entry/183/New_five_year_report_is_in_Vic#comm</comments>
                        <description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><p>THE Victorian Government has all but given up on a long-standing pledge to contain Melbourne's urban sprawl, announcing another big expansion of the metropolitan boundary for new housing.<br />
<br />
Six years after setting a "clear boundary" for the city in the<a rel="nofollow external" href="http://www.dse.vic.gov.au/melbourne2030online/" target="_blank"> Melbourne 2030</a> policy, the Government has succumbed to a booming population, a housing shortage and resistance to high-density development in established suburbs.<br />
<br />
A separate analysis predicted that Victoria's population would grow by more than 40 per cent by 2036, with Melbourne alone adding 1.8 million people — nearly twice the number forecast in Melbourne 2030.</p></blockquote><br />
<br />
<a rel="nofollow external" href="http://www.theage.com.au/national/goahead-for-urban-sprawl-20081202-6ps9.html" target="_blank">::View Article::</a><br />
<br />
<b>Even though it is three days old this is important news for Victoria. Why? Because it's evidence that despite spots of attention given to issues of sustainability here and there we have little control over our future in the face of the contemporary religions of growth and materialism. The population is growing with no end in sight and too many of us want the McMansion and the large block. Significant population growth, and the materialism championed by this population, represent human ideas which do not seem to correspond to a reality defined by finite resources and interconnected, dynamic eco-systems:</b><br />
<br />
<blockquote><p>Just two days after the Brumby Government announced an extension of Melbourne's urban boundaries, the state-appointed Sustainability Commissioner has warned of serious environmental damage on the city fringes and called for the boundaries to be fixed.<br />
<br />
Five years in the making and the first of its kind, the mammoth State of the Environment report by Sustainability Commissioner Ian McPhail also boldly contradicts other aspects of State Government policy.<br />
<br />
It slammed Victoria's emission reduction policies as being too weak and peripheral, while the "ecological footprint" of the average Victorian was calculated as being three times bigger than the world average.</p></blockquote><br />
<br />
<a rel="nofollow external" href="http://www.theage.com.au/environment/brumby-told-to-halt-the-sprawl-20081204-6rp0.html?page=fullpage#contentSwap1" target="_blank">::View Article::</a><br />
<br />
<b>Enough generalising:</b><br />
<br />
<blockquote><p>With more than half the state's vegetation already cleared and a further 4000 hectares disappearing each year, the state is described as the most cleared in Australia.<br />
<br />
Yesterday's report said 75 species had become extinct from Victoria and a further 935 were rare or threatened.</p></blockquote><br />
<br />
<a rel="external" href="http://www.theage.com.au/environment/eastern-victorias-health-quickens-development-pulse-20081204-6rpk.html" title="">::View Article::</a><br />
<br />
<b>No surprise here, surely. We might leave pockets of land uncleared in our rush to create land for housing and farming but this simply dices up wildlife habitats which need to be connected. Nature is not a collection of little isolated 'zoo's' dotted here and there but rather large, interconnected eco-system(s).</b><br />
<br />
<blockquote><p>The State Government's tactic of withholding environmental flows from rivers to secure drinking supplies was putting river health at "serious risk", according to yesterday's State of the Environment report.</p></blockquote><br />
<br />
<a rel="nofollow external" href="http://www.theage.com.au/environment/a-state-under-stress-20081204-6rpl.html?page=fullpage#contentSwap1" target="_blank">::View Article::</a><br />
<br />
<b>There are so many of us consuming water at such a rate and with so much wastage that our traditional water catchments and dams are becoming insufficient to meet demand. Thus we degrade more eco-systems (namely ones based around and dependent on rivers) by draining their lifeblood, sending it it via flows and pipes down to a thirsty city and surrounding suburbia. Creating dependency on rivers for our drinking water supplies is not smart if this contributes to their eventual demise.</b><br />
<br />
<blockquote><p>A step change increase in the provision of public transport services is required, particularly in outer suburbs, to drive a shift from private vehicles," Dr McPhail says in his report.<br />
<br />
Metropolitan Melbourne stopped (building new) public transport in the 1950s, when cheap motor vehicles and cheap petrol became available," Dr McPhail said.</p></blockquote><br />
<br />
<a rel="nofollow external" href="http://www.theage.com.au/environment/a-state-under-stress-20081204-6rpl.html?page=fullpage#contentSwap1" target="_blank">::View Article::</a><br />
<br />
<b>Our dedication to lavish suburban living is pushing the geographical boundaries of suburbia outwards all the time, meaning that more and more people need to drive to get to key central locations like the city. This is causing more pollution, road congestion, and stress.<br />
_______<br />
<br />
This is a brief summary of the news surrounding the report and its findings: that Victorians are slowly but surely grinding down 'their' environment. Now why should we all, from environmentalists to industry leaders, care?</b><br />
<br />
<blockquote><p>The Government was urged to accept that natural systems were the cornerstone of a strong economy, and was warned that Victoria's wealth would eventually suffer if the degradation of rivers and land continued.</p></blockquote><br />
<br />
<a rel="nofollow external" href="http://www.theage.com.au/environment/brumby-told-to-halt-the-sprawl-20081204-6rp0.html?page=fullpage#contentSwap1" target="_blank">::View Article::</a><br />
<br />
<b>Like the economic-centric argument which holds that a prosperous economy is essential to everyone regardless of whether your an ambitious capitalist or not, in that even artists, humanists, sports people (or any group) could not do what they do without an operational economy, the environment would seem to take an even more fundamental place in such reasoning. <br />
<br />
The environment lies at the heart of the economy. If economics is essential to a multi-faceted liberal society then the environment is fundamental.</b> ]]></description>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">183@http://australia.corrupt.org/pivot/</guid>
			<category>News</category>
			<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 18:24:00 -0800</pubDate>
		</item>
		
		
		
		<item>
			<title>Boat intercepted</title>
			<link>http://australia.corrupt.org/entry/182/Boat_intercepted</link>
			<comments>http://australia.corrupt.org/entry/182/Boat_intercepted#comm</comments>
                        <description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><p>The Federal Government has confirmed that a boat carrying 35 passengers and five crew has been intercepted off the coast of Western Australia.<br />
<br />
The boat was spotted by a surveillance plane yesterday afternoon near Ashmore Island, and then intercepted by the Border Protection Command. <br />
<br />
The Government says those on board will now be transferred to Christmas Island to be detained and processed.</p></blockquote><br />
<br />
<a rel="no follow external" href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2008/12/03/2436826.htm" target="_blank">::View Article::</a><br />
<br />
<b>We don't need to lock these human beings up for large periods of time without explanation or concern. However we do need to intercept them and send out the message to people smugglers and those considering coming here that we will determine our immigration intake and not vice versa. <br />
<br />
At leat, we do if we don't want a situation developing in which naturally ambitious poor and struggling people from Asia and beyond, but also those who smuggle them, begin to get the impression that Australia would be a nice country to get to with our 'wealth for toil', relative national harmony, and generous welfare system. <br />
<br />
Why? Well it has nothing to do with ethnic, class or political superiority. It's simply about the numbers. Asia, that large continent that we are separated from by a small stretch of water, has a population of around 4 billion (thousand million) people. According to <a rel="nofollow external" href="http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/EXTDEC/EXTRESEARCH/EXTPROGRAMS/EXTPOVRES/EXTPOVCALNET/0,,contentMDK:21867101~pagePK:64168427~piPK:64168435~theSitePK:5280443,00.html" target="_blank">World Bank Data</a> the percentage of people living below the poverty line in Southern Asia is 30.84%. China alone has a population of over 1.3 billion people and about 28% live below the poverty line. India has a population of over 1.1 billion people of which 42.68% exist below the poverty line...<br />
<br />
Australia itself has a population of just under 21 and a half million people and we are struggling to supply basics like water and housing as it is.<br />
<br />
Now obviously all of these people would not automatically pile into rickety boats and make for main land Australia if we ceased to deliver the message that we care about border protection and domestic population issues, but more would and this could well represent a huge amount of people.</b> ]]></description>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">182@http://australia.corrupt.org/pivot/</guid>
			<category>News</category>
			<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 16:14:00 -0800</pubDate>
		</item>
		
		
		
		<item>
			<title>NationaI internet filter and the nanny state</title>
			<link>http://australia.corrupt.org/entry/181/NationaI_internet_filter_and_t</link>
			<comments>http://australia.corrupt.org/entry/181/NationaI_internet_filter_and_t#comm</comments>
                        <description><![CDATA[ "But now the Federal Government's great broadband gift is floundering in the waves of the financial crisis and Communications Minister Stephen Conroy is pushing ahead with an internet filter that will dramatically slow Australian internet speeds.<br />
<br />
The biggest problem is a little word that Mr Conroy slipped out in the middle of a Senate committee hearing. The pilot filter program will not only target the existing blacklisted sites, most of which are child pornography, but will also target "unwanted" content, whatever that means.<br />
<br />
It's a bit embarrassing that we're discussing censoring the internet at all. What does it say about Australian politics that the reaction of both major parties to such a liberating technology is to demagogue about its dangers? Our politicians rave about evils online more than any other liberal democracy. As a consequence, the Federal Government's proposal is far more extensive than any other internet censorship scheme outside the totalitarian world."<br />
<br />
<a rel="nofollow external" href="http://www.theage.com.au/news/opinion/neutering-the-net-is-about-repression-not-protection/2008/11/29/1227491896118.html?page=fullpage#contentSwap1" target="_blank">::View Article::</a><br />
<br />
<b>As this article points out politicians harp on to un-proportional degrees about the negatives of the internet, i.e. child pornography, in order to scare us into giving them more control of the internet. Whenever the possibility of the government controlled filter blocking <i>legal </i>material is raised, the discussion is directed back to child porn.<br />
<br />
What does Senator Conroy mean when he says that the internet filter will block 'unwanted' content in addition to (already) illegal material? Who will decide what content/information is unwanted? <br />
<br />
On a broader level, why do we need the government to increasingly direct our behaviour in new spheres of life such as the net? Is it because we don't have the community bonds (i.e. consensus/values) which might better promote the avoidance of child pornography, sites on anorexia, and other material the government is sighting in order to worry us?</b> ]]></description>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">181@http://australia.corrupt.org/pivot/</guid>
			<category>News</category>
			<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 13:47:00 -0800</pubDate>
		</item>
		
		
		
		<item>
			<title>Maternity leave pay</title>
			<link>http://australia.corrupt.org/entry/180/Maternity_leave_pay</link>
			<comments>http://australia.corrupt.org/entry/180/Maternity_leave_pay#comm</comments>
                        <description><![CDATA[ "The Productivity Commission has recommended a taxpayer-funded scheme that would provide 18 weeks' paid leave at the adult minimum wage of $544 a week, costing the federal budget about $450 million a year and businesses $74 million in extra superannuation payments.<br />
<br />
In a draft report, the commission argues that such a scheme would "yield community-wide gains in the long term", including better child and maternal welfare, greater workforce participation by women, and improved work-family balance and gender equity.<br />
<br />
Although Labor has talked up the prospect of a scheme for years, it is now signalling that the policy could be dumped or shelved because of the financial crisis."<br />
<br />
<a rel="nofollow external" href="http://www.theage.com.au/national/new-call-for-maternity-leave-pay-20081129-6ng4.html?page=-1" target="_blank">::View Article::</a><br />
<br />
<b>No doubt the Productivity Commission recommended the scheme which the government now seems likely to sideline, because the benefits outweigh the costs.<br />
<br />
The benefits are two sided. On one hand working mothers themselves will be able to spend more crucial time looking after their new born children. This could only increase child mental and emotional well-being which would mean less government resources going towards such areas.<br />
<br />
On the other hand mothers who have had suitable time away from work after giving birth will still have a job, and won’t be unemployed. This will boost economic activity and all the tax and other benefits to the government that go along with economic activity. Under the current situation that delivers no significant amount of government funded paid maternity leave, potential mothers often have to leave their jobs completely in order to give birth and look after their new-born:</b><br />
<br />
"The report on global gender equity, released last week by the World Economic Forum, shows Australian women are the most educated in the world — ranking equal No.1 alongside Norway, Finland, Denmark, France, New Zealand and the US — but are ranked 40th in terms of female participation in paid work."<br />
<br />
<a rel="nofollow external" href="http://www.theage.com.au/national/new-call-for-maternity-leave-pay-20081129-6ng4.html?page=-1" target="_blank">::View Article:</a> ]]></description>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">180@http://australia.corrupt.org/pivot/</guid>
			<category>News</category>
			<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 13:29:00 -0800</pubDate>
		</item>
		
		
		
		<item>
			<title>The cult of desire</title>
			<link>http://australia.corrupt.org/entry/179/The_cult_of_desire</link>
			<comments>http://australia.corrupt.org/entry/179/The_cult_of_desire#comm</comments>
                        <description><![CDATA[ "Sexpo is the third biggest annual Victorian show behind the Royal Show and the Home Show. It attracted 70,000 visitors at the weekend. Sexpo, (or as my mate Dan calls it, Christmas For Perverts) originated in Melbourne 12 years ago. Our licence plates should say Victoria: Home of Sexpo. Or Victoria: A proud porn-loving community. Or perhaps, Victoria: We're gagging for it.<br />
<br />
The commodification of sex is depressing. Capitalism cultivates dissatisfaction. Sex sells by making us feel there is some sexual nirvana available that we could experience if only we had the right outfit, toy, partner or lube.<br />
<br />
The only other expo I've been to this year was The Bridal Expo. Both struck me as advertisements for some ultimate experience that didn't exist. Which won't stop us searching, feeling dissatisfied or wondering if we're getting enough."<br />
<br />
<a rel="external" href="http://www.theage.com.au/opinion/ah-am-a-little-confused-if-sex-sells-then-what-sells-sex-20081125-6hdy.html?page=-1" title="">::View Article::</a><br />
<br />
<b>It might be unfair to say that Capitalism, or more precisely our consumer culture, cultivates "dissatisfaction". That's a value judgement I'll leave to the individual. However consumerism does cultivate desire. Our society is filled with marketing campaigns alerting us to the existence of new products and often their social status in the hope we will develop the need, not harboured before hand, to buy them.<br />
<br />
So what? Well the society-wide cultivation of desire, now penetrating into the realm of sex, is not necessarily as hot as might be thought. It might be good for overall economic activity, but not necessarily overall wellbeing. To quote the 19th century Philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer, "All willing (desiring) arises from need, therefore from deficiency, and therefore from suffering". Translation: more desires = more feelings that something is lacking in life.<br />
<br />
The sex industry seeks to inflame our desires by making us feel that toys, outfits, porn, other products are needed for a fulfilling sex life when in fact most of us need just a partner we love and are attracted to.</b> ]]></description>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">179@http://australia.corrupt.org/pivot/</guid>
			<category>News</category>
			<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 11:43:00 -0800</pubDate>
		</item>
		
		
		
		<item>
			<title>The religion of quantity over quality</title>
			<link>http://australia.corrupt.org/entry/178/The_religion_of_quantity_over_</link>
			<comments>http://australia.corrupt.org/entry/178/The_religion_of_quantity_over_#comm</comments>
                        <description><![CDATA[ <b>The need to maximise the growth of the economy seems to be perceived as a self-evident truth in Australia. We don't just want a dynamic and well-oiled economy, we want one that is at all times getting bigger and bigger. At the 2020 summit held earlier this year, 1000 of our best and brightest got together to discuss the nation's future. A key topic was how to 'maximise economy growth'. Ross Gittens from The Age reports.</b><br />
<br />
"[One] of the summit's blinding insights was that "Australia should be the best place in the world to live and do business" which would require "urgent action to increase economic capacity".<br />
<br />
<a rel="nofollow external" href="http://business.smh.com.au/business/when-growth-turns-into-a-monster-20080506-2bky.html?page=2" target="_blank"><span style="color:Blue;">::View Article::</span></a><br />
<br />
<b>It's obviously being assumed here that the size of the economy and amount of economic activity determines whether a certain place is the best one in which to live. <br />
<br />
Is this true?</b><br />
<br />
"What we are looking at here is a period when immigration numbers have been really very high and population growth been quite sharp. Like in 2002 the population grew by 237,000. In 2007 it grew by 332,000."<br />
<br />
"So it has really grown quite fast and that is fast enough for people to actually see the effects of it. Especially in pressure points like Sydney and Melbourne, where most of the migrants go."<br />
<br />
"What happens is that people in Sydney are moving out at a much higher rate than they are from Melbourne and the reason for that is the high cost of housing as far as we can see," she said.<br />
<br />
"It is quite unusual that opposition to the immigration intake should rise during a period that was economically rosy, because you have to remember the people responded to this in late November and early December last year."<br />
<br />
<a rel="nofollow external" href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2008/10/13/2389242.htm" target="_blank"><span style="color:Blue;">::View Article::</span></a><br />
<br />
<b> Far from indicating that the worship of economic growth is making us happier one symptom of this worship, booming immigration, is making us move due to population congestion and housing shortages.<br />
<br />
Another way we can maximise economic growth is by working more again. But is does this represent a higher <i>quality </i>of life?</b> <br />
<br />
"Then there's the changed attitude to leisure. For 100 years to the beginning of the 1980s, falling working hours - from the 44-hour week to the 38-hour week - were regarded as a sign of social progress. We were happy to take part of our greater productivity in higher incomes and part in more leisure. Yet all that has changed."<br />
<br />
<a rel="nofollow external" href="http://business.smh.com.au/business/when-growth-turns-into-a-monster-20080506-2bky.html?page=2" target="_blank"><span style="color:Blue;">::View Article::</span></a><br />
<br />
<b>We are becoming more economically productive due to better technology and production methods which is great, but instead of using this as an opportunity to enjoy non-working life a bit more we're using the surplus in time and money to propel production further. But for what? Is the economy simply a means to an end or is it everything?<br />
<br />
We're even extending the strange quantity over quality mindset into the realm of the arts:</b><br />
<br />
"Even the summit's creativity stream fell into the economy trap: "We will aim to double cultural output by 2020," it concluded, as if the quantity of artistic product trumps its ability to stir our passions or let us see into the human condition. The Government was urged to "recognise the centrality of the arts and creativity to the whole economy"."<br />
<br />
<a rel="nofollow external" href="http://business.smh.com.au/business/when-growth-turns-into-a-monster-20080506-2bky.html?page=2" target="_blank"><span style="color:Blue;">::View Article::</span></a><br />
<br />
<b>Will the arts now have to be justified in terms of their contribution to growing the economy? Will we axe them if they are not 'efficient' enough?</b> ]]></description>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">178@http://australia.corrupt.org/pivot/</guid>
			<category>News</category>
			<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 16:09:00 -0800</pubDate>
		</item>
		
		
		
		<item>
			<title>World Philosophy Day was yesterday</title>
			<link>http://australia.corrupt.org/entry/177/World_Philosophy_Day_was_yeste</link>
			<comments>http://australia.corrupt.org/entry/177/World_Philosophy_Day_was_yeste#comm</comments>
                        <description><![CDATA[ "Despite continually proclaiming the importance of educating young Australians, our political leaders all seem to have overlooked the fact that today is World Philosophy Day. It is a day we should not allow to pass unmarked. <br />
<br />
Given Prime Minister Rudd's call for a responsible and egalitarian future, what is our Labor Government doing to promote World Philosophy Day and the importance of philosophy in the lives of every Australian? <br />
<br />
I think we've reached a critical mass. My suggestion is that today, our political leaders, and indeed all Australians, should read the UNESCO study, <a rel="nofollow external" href="http://portal.unesco.org/shs/en/ev.php-URL_ID=11575&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html" target="_blank"><span style="color:Gray;">Philosophy: A School of Freedom</span></a>, and make an immediate long term commitment to encouraging our children to be curious and to think critically."<br />
<br />
<a rel="nofollow external" href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2008/11/20/2423869.htm" target="_blank"><span style="color:Blue;">::View Article::</span></a><br />
<br />
<b>We live in a democracy and we pride ourselves on being a young and, most importantly, 'free' nation. But surely 'freedom' entails the ability to be able to think critically and objectively. <br />
<br />
True freedom is considering all the alternatives for oneself and then decide upon a course of action as an autonomous agent. It's not simply doing what everyone else does <i>because </i>everyone else is doing it. It's not voting a certain way simply <i>because </i>one's parents do it. It's not leading a certain life simply <i>because </i> it's glorified by television and marketing empires. All these are not examples of freedom because the motivations are coming more from outside rather than from within.<br />
<br />
Philosophy is not simply theology or the study of different ideologies. It is the study of the logic and the reasons behind different assertions and it helps one develop the ability to analyse other people's arguments, consider different modes of society, and generally be more of a 'free' agent in the world.</b> ]]></description>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">177@http://australia.corrupt.org/pivot/</guid>
			<category>News</category>
			<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 11:51:00 -0800</pubDate>
		</item>
		
		
		
		<item>
			<title>Rudd in free trade talks with China</title>
			<link>http://australia.corrupt.org/entry/176/Rudd_in_free_trade_talks_with_</link>
			<comments>http://australia.corrupt.org/entry/176/Rudd_in_free_trade_talks_with_#comm</comments>
                        <description><![CDATA[ "AUSTRALIA and China will accelerate negotiations to clinch a free trade agreement to stimulate their economies in the face of the global economic crisis.<br />
<br />
Speaking in Washington after a meeting with Chinese president Hu Jintao, Mr Rudd nominated increased trade and fiscal stimulation as key weapons in the fight against the crisis, which began on credit and stock markets but now threatens jobs and has plunged much of the world into, or near to, recession. <br />
<br />
"We have great interest to greater access to China's market in goods and in services.""<br />
<br />
<a rel="nofollow external" href="http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,24662469-601,00.html" target="_blank"><span style="color:Blue;">::View Article::</span></a><br />
<br />
<b>On one hand free trade with China might stimulate our economy, but at the same time it might contribute to a decline in jobs and conditions here in Australia. <br />
<br />
As taxes on imported goods and services from China are removed it becomes cheaper for an Australian business or company (or even consumer) to buy these foreign products instead of buying Australian equivalents, because they are often produced under lower pay and working conditions (and hence are offered at a lower price). The result is often Australian jobs like manufacturing disappearing. The only way Australian producers can compete is by lowering domestic wages and working conditions (leave/breaks/safety etc). <br />
<br />
Free trade generally makes our economy dependent upon the import of cheap products that we can't compete with, and reduces things to the lowest denominator.</b> ]]></description>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">176@http://australia.corrupt.org/pivot/</guid>
			<category>News</category>
			<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:20:00 -0800</pubDate>
		</item>
		
		
		
		<item>
			<title>Australia to join China in implementing mandatory internet censorship?</title>
			<link>http://australia.corrupt.org/entry/175/Australia_to_join_China_in_imp</link>
			<comments>http://australia.corrupt.org/entry/175/Australia_to_join_China_in_imp#comm</comments>
                        <description><![CDATA[ "AUSTRALIA will join China in implementing mandatory censoring of the internet under plans put forward by the Federal Government.<br />
<br />
The plan was first created as a way to combat child pornography and adult content, but could be extended to include controversial websites on euthanasia or anorexia. <br />
<br />
Mr Conroy said trials were yet to be carried out, but "we are talking about mandatory blocking, where possible, of illegal material." <br />
<br />
<a rel="nofollow external" href="http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,24568137-2862,00.html" target="_blank"><span style="color:Blue;">::View Article::</span></a><br />
<br />
<b>'Illegal'? That's a subjective value judgement. Even at this early stage is looks suspicious. Child porn, fine, but euthanasia (an issue surrounding the control over something as fundamental as one's own life span)? <br />
<br />
Anyway, who will decide what constitutes 'illegal' material? The Government, of course. But simply because the government is democratically elected does not mean this internet censorship plan will turn slowly turn into something other than arbitrary intrusion. Democracy is seeing power become increasingly delivered to central authorities behind the smokescreen of all the elections and 'unique' candidates.</b> ]]></description>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">175@http://australia.corrupt.org/pivot/</guid>
			<category>News</category>
			<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 15:48:00 -0800</pubDate>
		</item>
		
		
		
	</channel>
</rss>
